Who is auggie tantillo

We feel that it should be an open and fair competition. What are your concerns about furniture labeling and country-of-origin labeling in general?

We're concerned that the existing rules do not provide enough of a structure to ensure that the consumer has origin information when buying furniture. It may not be the overwhelming component of a consumer's decision, but we do think the consumer deserves the right to understand where the goods were made so that can be factored in. What is your stance on buy-American laws for federal procurement? We believe that those laws should be very tight; they should be waived only in a period of national emergency such as wartime.

We believe that it's critical for our military to have a vibrant industrial base and one of the ways to ensure that is to require that goods made for the military be produced in the U. Should they be expanded beyond the Department of Defense?

We think that they should. We definitely feel that groups such as the Department of Homeland Security should be covered. Any agency that has a national security angle we believe should not be dependent on some outside foreign entity to produce the products that it procures. How has the current administration responded to your concerns about the U.

Quite frankly, we think that there needs to be a significantly greater emphasis on developing a rational trade policy that recognizes that the U. Subscribe Now. Register with JOC. After thirty days, you will receive 3 pieces of content and after sixty days you will receive 1 piece of content. To receive full access, Subscribe Today.

You can also subscribe to our daily newsletter. Skip to main content. Forgot your password? Remember me. His institutional knowledge of previous trade agreements is amazing. For Auggie Tantillo, that portrait was a masterpiece. Having Auggie at the helm of NCTO advanced our entire industry by leaps and bounds, and we wish him the very best as he moves on to his next great portrait.

He is a true Southern Gentlemen and commanded the respect and confidence of all he came into contact with on Capitol Hill and in other agencies of the government. He will be missed. He is held in the highest regard by friends and colleagues of the industry he has represented so well for many years, and those of us who have been privileged to work so closely with him have witnessed first-hand his incredible knowledge and discerning wisdom.

He has qualities that are increasingly rare, and I am grateful to have worked with someone of such distinguished character and integrity.

His long-standing career, built by mutual respect and wisdom, has spanned many levels in Washington and throughout our industry. I wish Auggie the best in his retirement as he leaves a successful legacy! I was always impressed with how impactful he was considering that he was so calm and matter of fact in his presentation of issues. He has given all of himself and has achieved immeasurable success for our industry.

Actions speak louder than words. He also wrote a letter to Cass Johnson of the NCTO saying that he was committed to pursuing most of the aggressive policies requested by the industry. I enjoyed this part of the book and I look forward to reading part IV.

Different sides may demand totally different policy actions. For an industry, it needs to be clear about what policy is in its best sectoral interest. Often time, these two are not necessarily the same. Part III of the book discussed a lot about what we have been talking about in class.

Many USA textile and apparel factory workers have lost their jobs due to companies choosing to do business in China. This understandably upset a lot of people in the US textile manufacturing industry, such as Auggie, who decided to try to do something about it. We talked in class about how there are always winners and losers in the industry and how if political leaders do not make desirable choices, it can lead to protests.

I like how the book explains the effects of politics on the textile and apparel industry. For example, the book describes how politicians seemed to want to help people like Auggie only to win their votes. It makes it seem as if politicians only make decisions to quiet protests instead of because they actually really care about the issue at hand.

It seems that putting restrictions on one product benefits part of the industry but hurts another part of it. I particularly enjoyed the last few pages of this section when the author talks about how British citizens were forced to where wool instead of imported cotton products in order to protect their domestic market. Although this was less desirable for British consumers, it eventually led to the development of machinery used to make cotton products in Britain.

It makes me wonder what would happen to the industry in the USA if we were not allowed to use imported textile and apparel products. I think this would be impossible.

Great comment and thoughts!! To put it simple, industry leaders always think about the sectoral interests while the US president has to think about the national interests. The information that I gathered from these chapters has the potential to be very valuable to a person entering the textile and apparel industry. Auggie Tantillo, a man fighting to keep textile and apparel manufacturing jobs in the US, predicts that China will essentially ruin the US textile and apparel manufacturing industry.

He explained that we have already lost countless jobs to China and this pattern will only continue. As the President of the US Association of Importers of Textiles and Apparel, she believes that trying to re-shore textile and apparel manufacturing jobs would be fruitless. The US would lose more money than they would gain. I believe that Julia has a very modern view to the industry. She sees that because of globalization, the industry is drastically evolving.

The most realistic action to take is to keep up with the changes and adjust our industries accordingly. Yes, it is a shame that manufacturing jobs are decreasing in the US, but other jobs are being created because of the same cause. Politics ultimately control trade and how the textile and apparel industry will operate. Although he kept this promise, Rivoli also talks about policymakers telling US manufacturers that they will help them in return for their vote.

Both Obama and Romney spoke about domestic manufacturing in the presidential debates. They both made it clear that they want to help small businesses and US based companies remain successful in the US.

It still leaves me wondering- are they telling the truth? After completing Assignment 3, I have become familiar with the rules of origin talked about in the preceding chapter. Overall, it seems as though the yarn-forward rule and fabric-forward rule are great options to boost the US economy.

The involved countries also benefit because they can export to the US duty-free. Now, with TPP in the works, it will be interesting to see if they employ rules of origin in their trade agreements.

Service job is as important as manufacturing job. Part three of The Travels of a T-Shirt in the Global Economy starts to talk about how Auggie Tantillo cannot go into a Wal-Mart because he is the executive director of the American manufacturing trade action coalition.

This group wants to preserve jobs in the U. S textile and apparel industry. Especially being that I am graduating in a year and I need of a job, I do not want there to be no jobs in America because they all were sent abroad. Hearing the opposite side of Julia Hughes who is supporting the clothing in China is horrible. When the book started to talk about how in the came out with the Central America Free Trade Agreement. Since we were learning about this in class I think it is a good idea.

Having the import of the product be duty free is helping the United States out. Also it is using our product, which allows us to be able to keep jobs in the United States. In chapter ten it mentions about all our past presidents and how politics affects the global economy. This was a very important thing to the American people. Throughout reading this chapter I have noticed a lot of these words are of what we are learning right now in class. Hearing about how large the textile industry is and where it has come from is interesting to know about.

This to me is crazy. To think about how jobs are just going to keep disappearing with or without protection from imports. In short textile jobs are not going to China; textile jobs are just going period. In the world today we are always trying to advance to better and bigger technology but actually the technology we are creating is hurting us in the long run. The United States is bring its own country down because we are producing more technology.

When Auggie was asked if they think this letter helped him win North Carolinas victory he said yes! This had me taken back because did he really do a good job at saving jobs in the United States. This section was very eye opening and made a lot of sense on why we are where we are today.

The politics of the apparel industry are so intense I had no idea. Rivoli did a great job of explain the fear some countries have over china. I was taken back by this section, there was a lot of good information many people should know. For one thing, the U. It is fascinating to see how the U. Auggie and the U. This seems to be a trend, with the textile and the apparel and retail sector clashing. Even the U. It was also interesting how when something is denied free trade, such as cotton imports into the U.

For example, when cotton imports where limited, the U. Quotas and restrictions also encourage low-end producers to become high-end producers that compete with the U. As a result, high-end clothing production has shifted abroad. I think the author makes a great point to the reader which backs up what we have learned in class that because of technology and mechanization textile jobs are disappearing. Employment in the textile industry is falling not because of China, but because of the increase in productivity.

Even China is losing textile jobs. Is it really worth all the protection? I found part 3 to be controversial and interesting. Chapter 9 goes into more detail about the restrictions that had been in place on Chinese apparel imports from On one hand, the restrictions were great for American workers looking to save their jobs.

On the other hand, however, the consumers were more excited by the lift of the restrictions, as the lift brought less expensive clothes to the retail market.

The controversy is intertwined with the retail market. While American apparel manufacturers would rather keep their jobs, the American retail market would rather pay less for the manufacturing of the garments they sell. Unfortunately, it is not just the jobs and workers in the U. The textile industry is seeing a decrease in jobs with the increase of technology. While quotas and tariffs are no help to the U. The discontinuance of tariffs and quotas would absolutely be a problem, as the already limited competition that China has would no longer exist.

As stated in Chapter 12, this problem is not new. History shows that the Chinese have previously dominated the market. The problem today is that those who can stop the monopoly of China in the textile and apparel markets fluctuate between imposing the tariffs and quotas, and the discontinuance.

Another problem would be that it is not just the U. While the U. How does the U. It also creates more favorable trade enviroment for those export-oriented industries. I found part three of this book to be one of the most relevant and interesting parts of the book that we have read thus far. The part that stuck out to me the most was the discussion of job growth and the factors of industrialization and globalization. I feel like the United States has always strived to be as technically advanced as possible, thinking that advancement will help us continue to prosper.

Especially now during the presidential election, I feel like many people choose to believe that a great deal of the reason why there have been so many job losses within the United States is because of globalization. Without thinking in depth about the issue, you could argue that this is true.

Another new fact that I learned concerned China and their job decline. I feel that many Americans think of China as the reason for so many job losses due to globalization, while China is dealing with the same repercussions of advanced technology as we are.

I totally enjoy your comment! I hope the upcoming class will further open your eyes and bring you more thoughts. As I was reading about both sides, it is hard for me to pick a clear cut side on who is right or wrong because there are negatives and positives to both of them.

The more I read, the more I learned about all of the different tactics that were used to try and control quotas and tariffs for other countries. The one section that I did enjoy reading about is how jobs may be ending in the US but other jobs are also starting.

The book talks about how there are new positions and groups in companies that were not there a decade ago but because of new technology everyday, there are needs for new positions. Knowing that people are able to make fabric that could stop bleeding or transmit information to doctors is something that we should also be prided on. In the last section of the book, It was put together on how powerful politics is, and how on every aspect of what they are for can make a difference on who can get elected.

Especially with this being the election year, this really shows how if you take a little extra time, as Obama did, then things can turn out in your favor. I was surprised while reading just how bad this sector of our economy really had become and the numbers in the statistics shown throughout the chapter.

Seeing the clothing production numbers go from fifty percent produced domestically in to ninety-five percent being produced overseas in was a shock to me. Even though Auggie can see a release in job news every month with declines and bad news he continues his fight against cheaper imports into the U. I admire the determination Auggie holds himself to in order to keep a U.

S textile mill a few more years to keep a community intact, and a family fed and provided for. The opposing side to Auggie and his efforts to keep cheap textiles out of the U.

S is a woman named Julia Hughes. I found her platform on the issue interesting how she believes the entrance of cheap T-shirts should be allowed and may the best T-shirt win! Economist join Julia on this platform believing that free trade should be in motion and without all of the rules the government attempts to attach to them. With all of the rules incorporated with free trade Julia feels the importers take one look and walk away due to the complexity. Auggie sees the complications in the rules behind free trade as a result from exceptions made for Julia in the first place.

It is hard to see people like Auggie struggle and diminish slowly in attempts to save U. Reading further into part three I found it interested just how large the role politics plays in the textile industry and rights of trade. The size of the industry, the U. S textile geographic concentration, and concern for effects of trade with China on smaller American communities are all factors contributing to the political influences.

S textile industry. Associations came together to make one voice from the retailers and importers, developing countries, and family businesses caused the rich countries to abandon MFA and attempt to vanish trade quotas.

I was interested to read about the differences between the general public and economist views on trade. Even though there are differences in views from society and economist it comes back to the influence of politics in the matter. In chapter twelve it was interesting to read how Obama reassured the NCTO that they had his support and he was aware of the help the industry needed.

Just like Regan, Nixon, and Carter in past years providing their attention to the issues in this industry, Obama made sure his presence and actions involved in aiding the industry were available when needed.

I am looking forward to seeing how the book will conclude. Part three of travels of a T-shirt went more in depth on a topic that I had learned about in another class a few years back. However, I did learn some new and shocking things. It was interesting to learn the Bill Clinton was the most free trade friendly president in the U.

S because I was unaware of this. I found it upsetting that the United States kept a tight quota system in place with high tariffs that prevented the developing countries from becoming prosperous. All countries deserve the right to become prosperous. This is selfish of the U. S considering they earn more tariff revenue from poor developing countries than they do from prosperous ones. Even though the United States does not have a big textile and apparel manufacturing sector anymore and factories in places like North Carolina are closing, Americans still have the ability to get jobs elsewhere, in other industries.

In poor developing countries the people making the textiles and apparel do not have any other choice. It is amazing that the United States exported nearly 7 billion pounds of used clothing to the rest of the world between and It is even more amazing that certain countries adore this used clothing.

However, it is sad that even when this used clothing is sent to places such as Africa, most people cannot even afford the price of the used clothing. This industry of sending our used clothing that does not fit in second hand stores to poor countries has become very controversial.

I found part three interesting to read because it put a lot of things I had been curious about into perspective. For example, I knew that there was a lot of conflict between groups that supported free trade and clothing imports from places like China, and I also knew that there were people who saw these imports as a negative contributor to the US economy.

I did not realize how much of a role politics played and how these opposing groups of people and organizations actually debate their opinion in Washington DC. He firmly believes that there should not be Chinese textile imports, because it will take away jobs in the US; already half of the jobs in the industry were lost between and This argument makes it very tempting to agree with Auggie and completely oppose trade agreements and organizations.

The author discusses the complications of many of these agreements, and as we have talked about in class, there are winners and losers in each situation, and often unintended consequences, as Rivoli mentions in chapter Every president has had to deal with trade agreements, and decisions about imports. For others, it was a clear case of the best economic policy. It was eye opening to read about how past presidents such as Kennedy and Nixon dealt with this situation.

I would like to have a job in the industry one day and it is comforting to know how supportive President Obama was of the industry and how he kept his promises. This whole section taught me a lot and I hope to learn more from the final section of the book. I found part III to be the most interesting so far.

I especially enjoyed reading the chapter on products returning from overseas to America. I never realized how big of an issue it is for some Americans to accept the importation of products. So after reading that, I better understood the story of Auggie Tantillo. I found it amazing that apparel from China could have that big of an impact on someone that they avoid the clothing section in Wal-Mart completely.

It is understandable though, since China has become a growing threat to jobs in the textile and apparel industry in America. After reading the section, A Taste of the Crazy Rules in , it was easier for me to relate to the class. In order to have duty-free access to the U. I find it interesting that it is not only cheaper, but easier to just pay the tariff. I really liked that I was able to relate part III to class lectures and now feel like I have a better understanding after reading real life situations.

I look forward to finishing up the rest of the book. I enjoyed reading Part III: Trouble at the Border because it explained more in detail what goes on in the textile and apparel industry in relation to politics.

What we usually see is just what is on the surface, but this part told a more candid account of how the system really works. This part really expanded on our discussions about China and the United States, and made it clear that the issues with China and trade really are an issue for our textile and apparel industry.

He is very determined in his mission and wants to make sure jobs stay in our economy rather than be outsourced to China. I also like how this point was brought full circle in Chapter 12 about President Obama. In he really devoted many resources to the textile communities in North Carolina, creating and sustaining jobs there even after the election. But what Obama showed is that so much of the industry is being outsourced and hurting American jobs, but with changes like the ones in North Carolina we can save our textile industry and keep the jobs here in America.

I would never have thought that. Another portion of part III that really stuck out to me was the political side. Especially since we just had our Presidential election last night, it is very relevant.

I look forward to reading part IV. And because we just recently had an election last night where Obama was re-elected for a second term, this section gave me more insight on the global apparel trade sector as a whole and how it applies to politics. It was also interesting to learn that Bill Clinton was the most free trade friendly of all presidents, and that currently President Obama is very supportive of the U.

This section of the book has been my favorite so far because it addressed how textiles are impacted by politics and vice versa. It was really informative and I learned they are trying to preserving manufacturing jobs in the U. It was astonishing to read that the U. These factors include the size of the manufacturing base, the strength of industry alliances and business relationships, and the fact that Americans are nervous about trade.

The book talked about how politicians sometimes use the textile and apparel industry to get more votes; I really enjoyed reading about how President Obama promised to help the domestic industry by devoting resources to them. The first chapter starts out with a man Auggie Tantillo who is actively against outsourcing for apparel from china. Auggie is specifically fighting to keep textile and apparel jobs within the United States in hopes that China does not ruin the textile and apparel manufacturing industry.

Auggie worries that China is taking all of the jobs and that there is not enough for Americans. As a country we would lose more profit than we would gain due to the fact that producing domestically is more expensive than outsourcing. In chapter ten it discusses the past presidents and how politics played a huge role in the textile and apparel industry. The current problems we are facing were a predominant part of the presidents speeches in previous years.

As a textile student, knowing that this used to be a concern and is no longer bothers me. In chapter eleven a line in particular stuck out to me. In , 95 percent of apparel purchased by U. I was aware that we imported a lot of apparel due to the efficiency and lower cost of other countries, but I was unaware that it was to this great extent.

Having 95 percent of what our citizens consume is ridiculous and I am shocked that it is to this extent. Overall, I was thoroughly intrigued by part III. Though the result of all of these things is harmful to our country, it is interesting to learn about real life examples to further explain what we are learning in class.

Initially I had solely attributed the plunge of employment within the American Textile Industry to the cheap labor in China however, this does not seem to be the case. It was interesting to learn that while employment within the U. This information when combined with the fact that in U. This also helped me to understand the rationalization behind a firm choosing to replace more and more people with machines, it is now something necessary to industry survival.

The significant job loss occurring within the Chinese textile sector is something I was surprised to see, but the affect of technology on the industry helps to justify this phenomenon. It was also interesting how each organization is really their own worst enemy, and that the import barriers they support create higher cost for one another at each stage of production. This portion of the book taught me about the major role politics play in both the race to the bottom, and in globalization.

I found that the third part of Travels of a T-shirt helped me realize that politics play a huge role on free trade and clothing imports from other developing countries. Such politic topics include negative thoughts on how imports from developing countries, such as China, are not a great contributor to the United States economy.

Within the first chapter of part three, Auggie described his disgust with Wal-Mart clothing because he wants change for the American textile and apparel industry. His main mission is to keep the jobs created within the United States by the textile and apparel industry and not let those jobs be shipped over to other countries for them to be fulfilled. A section of part three that actually surprised me was the subject on how Obama created resources within America in order to keep jobs within the textile industry.

This is the essence of the political debate in part III. Part 3 of the T-shirt book linked the loss of jobs to the increase in technology. The book mentions that as production is rising so is the unemployment rate in the United States. Our advanced technology is something we pride ourselves on as a country, yet it is taking away our jobs.

As globalization becomes a worldwide phenomenon the loss of jobs due to technological production are becoming an issue. Although globalization is taking away jobs, the textile and apparel industry is also relying more on technology.

After reading I realized that even without overseas competition in the industry, companies who did not use technology would be less successful. Part III of the T-shirt book appealed to me more than the other parts in the book. Although this is true and devastating for the U. It is not an easy task, but overtime I think it can gradually get better with enough support.

It really made sense to me when the text explained how when the Chinese quotas were increased in , it was to be the last nail for the U. I found it very interesting how McCain had a more realistic view on the problem in America with a decrease in manufacturing jobs and how they are not coming back any time soon.

This was a different approach than what Clinton and Obama went with during the Democratic nomination. I enjoyed reading about this past issue, especially with the Presidential election recently occurring.

But inevitably, it was later figured out that textile jobs are going, no matter with or without protection of imports. Technology is only becoming more beneficial and high-tech and labor productivity is also increasing.

It is a very complex task to achieve and who knows when textile jobs will be back on track in the U. I found it extremely intriguing that Obama wore American-made suits throughout his first campaign. He even referred to a North Carolina-based yarn spinning company called Carolina Mills to represent the U. Obama wants to see a positive change in this industry in a positive way to increase textile jobs in America, rather than what McCain tried to do was to support tax breaks and trade deals for companies that ship jobs overseas.

I found this to be that it is not American of John McCain to sell out the Carolina Mills company at the time with Washington to have workers jobs at the company outsourced to Asia. He wanted to develop a relationship with the NCTO. These certain issues discussed in Part III were fascinating to me and I enjoyed reading about topics that stood out to me as relevant and important to be informed with.

In the third part of the book I really enjoyed reading about all the different groups and organizations that are in the mists of protecting the United States apparel and textile industries. I think it is really interesting on how influential theses groups are in politics. These promises may or may not be in the best interest of the US consumers or other industries, and the fact that the presidents will just automatically agree to just about anything.

This just sounds absurd to me. I doubt most of these workers even make that in a year! It was also pointed out that a lot of the jobs are gone not only to increased imports and low cost competitors but because of technological advances. I feel like all the money saved on protecting the industry, the money should be invested in the industry, invest in technology and advances.

I agree with this. I think the US should be thinking long term, rather than protecting themselves today. We are borrowing ourselves into a whole we may never be able to pay off. As much as I respect Auggie for wanting to do so, there is a reason we have the labor done in factories in other countries, like China. They do the labor for a lot cheaper then American workers, and do not require as much training as US workers. Since China does the manufacturing labor for so cheap, we make machines and airplanes and sell them to China in return.

Auggie clearly did not feel this way though and had an army ready to fight for his beliefs. Auggie even wanted President Reagan to put a stop to textile and apparel imports into the United States.

Auggie was eventually disappointed when he found out how politics really worked. Reagan did not end up putting a stop to this. It is interesting how politics and the President had so much effect on the textile industry and it is not really like that anymore. One thing about the the Presidents effecting what happens with manufacturing being done overseas and trading that I liked in this section is how it discusses our current President.

President Obama donated resources to North Carolina and he only wore suits made in America throughout his campaign. Thanks to Obama, North Caroline allowed 60, jobs in the textile and apparel industry. It is very difficult these days to find work in the textile industry due to the competition with China. I was already aware that many of the jobs in the US have been outsourced to China, but after reading part 3 of the book, it really made the reality so much more clear.

It seems that at some point all of the manufacturing jobs in America will go to China. It was great to read about people like Auggie who are still so passionate and trying to fight to keep the jobs in America. It is good to see that restrictions have been placed on Chinese apparel imports. There seems to be controversy in the industry, because the retail market likes the cheap clothing they are able to get from China, but the manufacturing sector in the US does not want to lose jobs.

Jobs in the industry are also declining due to the increase of technology. However they are still necessary because these tariffs and quotas are putting restrictions on China and keeping them from completely dominating the industry.

I found part III of travels of a t-shirt to be very interesting and informative. There were a lot of important topics that were discused in this part that I though were very appropriate for the fact that we are in an election season. A part of this section that I found to be interesting was how the book discussed the issues within the textile and apparel industry that we might not hear or see.

In the Textile and Apparel industry there are a lot of people who are losing their jobs because their companies moving the factories and production over to china.